
Do dogs hate trikes?
5 months ago
Sunday morning in Rotterdam. Once again a dog tried to attack us. This time it happened in front of the camera (from 0.40). Do dogs hate trikes, or what?
No music this time. Just the sound of the city.
Some shots were done with the camera mounted on the trike, others handheld.
The photos were taken by my wife Trudy.
The movements in the original interlaced footage are fluid. Unfortunately once compressed (using vimeo guidelines for uploading) all fluidness is lost. Does anybody know how to improve this?
Edit: new upload with a bitrate of 3500.
All rights reserved. 2makemovies.nl
No music this time. Just the sound of the city.
Some shots were done with the camera mounted on the trike, others handheld.
The photos were taken by my wife Trudy.
The movements in the original interlaced footage are fluid. Unfortunately once compressed (using vimeo guidelines for uploading) all fluidness is lost. Does anybody know how to improve this?
Edit: new upload with a bitrate of 3500.
All rights reserved. 2makemovies.nl
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.
- Vimeo: About / Blog / Roadmap / Developers / Community Guidelines / Forums / Toys / Help! / Site Map
- Legal: ©2008 Vimeo, LLC / Terms & Conditions / Privacy Statement




.




112
5
10
0
0
0
Previous Week
Beautifull moving camera shots from your trike: it's a great dolly system. The ratling of the chain is great sound and doesn't ask for music support.
On my computer movements seem to be fluid. Maybe you can lower the bitrate the remove the shakyness with slower computers.
My Mac is not too slow, but still I have this stroboscopic effect. After Vimeo compression it's worse.
I'm now rendering a new movie with a bitrate of 3500 (instead of 6000). Maybe I'll buy a new Mac and see if that helps :)
I have some strobe in the second scene when filming through the fence. That could be normal for the Vim-compression with the vertical lines at 24P.
The lower bitrate did little for me (just some more artifacts than the 6000 kbps version). But maybe on other computers it will help.
'Cycling' is also jittery, not by the handshake, but on quick cammoves and pans in the image. Statics are good.
And you say that the original 'interlaced' images are fluent. Is the intermediate QT h.264 version OK?
If yes, then it must have to do with the V-compression at 24p. I know 24p and 25p is a bit jittery on pixelmovement. More tests will be necessary to find out...lol.
Edit: when looking carefully at my bridge video, you will also see the 24p jitter.
The interlaced footage is fluent, both on the computer screen and on a tv set (even if the footage is downsized and burned on a SD DVD).
When I compress using (very) high bitrates the quality is acceptable. Lower bitrates bring the mentioned effect.
You're right: I will keep testing. Thanks for all the advice.
Next time one attacks I will ask him ...... :)
On a big screen the low angle shots are impressive. Gives a little bit the impression of F1 footage :)