More
See all Show me
A one and a half minute excerpt of a composition that iterates through every song you could possibly play using the twelve notes of the chromatic scale, as quickly as possible.

As quickly as possible means: each chord lasts one wavelength of the lowest note.

(The sync is off a bit near the beginning.)

Watch it for longer on OpenProcessing: openprocessing.org/visuals/?visualID=1170

Credits

8 Likes

  • Simon deVet 1 year ago
    I like the one in the early 12000's best.
  • Simon deVet 1 year ago
    20900 is also pretty awesome.
  • Kyle McDonald 1 year ago
    Thanks :) I've tried this with non-chromatic scales and the result is more aesthetically interesting (I think), but I thought I'd post this since it's the "purest".
  •  
  • kitschpatrol plus 1 year ago
    nice. how long is the whole thing?
  • Kyle McDonald 1 year ago
    It lasts forever :) That's why I jokingly say "excerpt". If you'd like to hear, I can post the code somewhere -- but this is more of a minor exploratory prelude to a bigger project I'm working.
  • kitschpatrol plus 1 year ago
    hah, right, well, practically forever, but it's still technically finite — just curious how the numbers worked out if you had, say, eons to listen.
  • Kyle McDonald 1 year ago
    :) If I understand correctly, the natural numbers are infinite (but countable -- by definition) and there is one composition for every natural number. So it is infinite... as far as the scale goes, in this excerpt it takes about 90 seconds to get through about 21,600 compositions. That's about 240 compositions a second. The third chord will be introduced at 2^25 (=2^(2 * 12 + 1)) iterations, or 33,554,432, or in about 139,810 seconds = 38 hours. The fourth chord is introduced in about 18 years. The fifth chord, about 74,000 years.
  • kitschpatrol plus 1 year ago
    ah right right — naturally infinite, i guess i was thinking in digital terms wherein the number of possibilities would be bound by the sample rate? would that make sense? i've worked with bitmaps in a sort-of-similar way (iterating through possibilities at a certain resolution) so i'm trying to understand this in the same context, which might be an apples-to-oranges situation. thanks for the numbers, though!
  • Kyle McDonald 1 year ago
    Oh, exactly, I should have clarified: in theory, it is infinite, in practice it is finite. If you listen to it linearly, in practice it is infinite less because of hardware constraints than age-of-the-universe constraints :) Bitmaps: there are very interesting here, but the space is huge! Sound can be analyzed in one dimension, but it's hard to do the same in a meaningful way with images. You might enjoy John Simon's "Every Icon numeral.com/eicon.html and Jim Campbell's "The End" jimcampbell.tv/DU/DUTheEnd

    I think that once you get past the "performance art" aspect of work like this, you have to ask questions like: "How do we iterate through every /interesting/ image?" and "When is one image sufficiently different from another to be perceived as 'unique'?"
  •  
  • Irina Shatalova plus 1 year ago
    magic
  •  
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.

Advertisement

1 Related collections

Groups Groups

Statistics

  •  
    plays
    likes
    comments
  • Total
    plays 504
    likes 8
    comments 10
  • Nov 14th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Nov 13th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Nov 12th
    plays 1
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Nov 11th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Nov 10th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Nov 9th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Nov 8th
    plays 2
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Nov 7th
    plays 1
    likes 0
    comments 0
Previous Week

Downloads

Please join Vimeo or log in to download the original file. It only takes a few seconds.