
The New Tithe
1 year ago
Mega-churches have used religion as fund-raising tool for too long. They shower their followers in sanctimonious platitudes, then clamor for their cash. This video encourages a new definition of tithing by giving to causes with accountability.
Written & Directed by Tony Wann & Justin Wilson
Motion Graphics by Tony Wann
Live Action/Edit/Sound Design by Justin Wilson
Music: Good Old Neon
"One Never Says Verbal When One Means Oral"
licensed under a Sampling Plus License
freemusicarchive.org/music/Good_Old_Neon
Stills licensed from iStockphoto LP or shot by us
Sources:
Senator Grassley Senate Finance Committee files
Review of Media-Based Ministries - January 6, 2011
- taxdollars.ocregister.com/files/2011/01/SFC-Staff-Memo-to-Grassley-re-Ministries-01-06-11-FINAL.pdf
Forbes - America's Biggest Megachurches - June 26, 2009
- forbes.com/2009/06/26/americas-biggest-megachurches-business-megachurches.html
USA Today - View of God can predict values, politics - Nov. 12, 2006
- usatoday.com/news/religion/2006-09-11-religion-survey_x.htm
Special thanks to our on-screen talent: Sierra Sintic, Justin Lochlear, Artie Pena, James Rayburn, Matt Pittman, David Slack
Grand Prize Winner of the 2010 Project Reason Video Contest
Written & Directed by Tony Wann & Justin Wilson
Motion Graphics by Tony Wann
Live Action/Edit/Sound Design by Justin Wilson
Music: Good Old Neon
"One Never Says Verbal When One Means Oral"
licensed under a Sampling Plus License
freemusicarchive.org/music/Good_Old_Neon
Stills licensed from iStockphoto LP or shot by us
Sources:
Senator Grassley Senate Finance Committee files
Review of Media-Based Ministries - January 6, 2011
- taxdollars.ocregister.com/files/2011/01/SFC-Staff-Memo-to-Grassley-re-Ministries-01-06-11-FINAL.pdf
Forbes - America's Biggest Megachurches - June 26, 2009
- forbes.com/2009/06/26/americas-biggest-megachurches-business-megachurches.html
USA Today - View of God can predict values, politics - Nov. 12, 2006
- usatoday.com/news/religion/2006-09-11-religion-survey_x.htm
Special thanks to our on-screen talent: Sierra Sintic, Justin Lochlear, Artie Pena, James Rayburn, Matt Pittman, David Slack
Grand Prize Winner of the 2010 Project Reason Video Contest
MOV
00:02:59
18 Related collections
See all 18 collections| Date | Plays | Likes | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Totals | 35.4K | 113 | 42 |
| Feb 23rd | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 22nd | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 21st | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 20th | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 19th | 26 | 1 | 0 |
| Feb 18th | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 17th | 19 | 0 | 0 |
-
Vimeo: About / Blog / Developers / Jobs /
Community Guidelines /
Help Center / Video School / Music Store / Site Map
/ Vimeo
or
-
Legal: TM + ©2012 Vimeo, LLC. All rights reserved. / Terms of Service / Privacy Statement / Copyright

Prev week
Good luck with the top 10 and the voting!
Good Luck*
While I appreciate your talent (excellent editing and graphic work, etc), I'm not sure you actually make an argument in this video. You inculcate the beginning of your film with myriad of statistics, but when you get to the most important part of your argument - that churches supposedly "line their pockets" with money given to them by the federal government - you just show shots of random large houses with absolutely no context (and then some anonymous guy staring at a church looking disappointed).
I'm not saying that faith-based groups - ESPECIALLY mega-churches (which, for the record, do NOT make up the majority of American Christians) - don't have their own problems when it comes to using their money for the greater good, but even when the data is mixed (see here: onfaith.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2010/02/one_year_into_the_obama_faith-based_office_let_the_opining_begin.html) they still - overall - offer services just as good as or even better than their "secular" counterparts. Furthermore, most of the service organizations in lower-income American neighborhoods ARE faith-based.
I'm all for holding institutions accountable, but making blanket statements about an entire religious group (or, f I'm reading your video right, ALL religious groups) based off of mega-churches - and doing so with no data or context - seems to be counter-productive. Help me out here, brother - what's the goal in all this?
Thanks for writing. Our argument/goal/statement is simple: Think critically about how you give back to your community.
If you missed any context or narrative sub-plots, I can assure you they support our statement.
Your article gently grazes the fact faith-based groups that get public money can discriminate in hiring based on religion or homosexuality. This is at best a violation of church-state separation and at worst an implicit endorsement of discrimination. And only one of a myriad of reasons we thought to make this film.
Charities and churches are identical in many ways.
The people that are in charge or work for the charities are often very well paid with some of them making 100,000$ to a few hundred thousand. They take money donated to charity and stay in 4 star hotels and live like kings.
It has been reported that a mere 10 cents on every dollar actually goes to those it was meant for. when you add to the fact that most charity's withhold money for when they really need it you understand better how little of the money is available and is used on those it was intended for.
I understand charity workers need to live to but I I don't think they need to stay in 4 star hotels on charity money and I don't think taking money from the poor to pay their 6 figure salary's is justified either.
Churches and charities are also very different. For starters, churches don't have to tell anyone how their money is being spent, while charities do. Churches lawfully discriminate against gays and other religions in hiring practices, while charities cannot.
You could replace the word "charity" with "church" in your post and it would be just as factually correct.
"It has been reported that a mere 10 cents on every dollar actually goes to those it was meant for."
- Do you have a source for this?
I strongly believe in god and giving money to further the preaching of the good news. I find how the money is used by churches disgusting.
No Tithing for Christians. At no time were first-century Christians commanded to pay tithes. The primary purpose of the tithing arrangement under the Law had been to support Israel’s temple and priesthood; consequently the obligation to pay tithes would cease when that Mosaic Law covenant came to an end as fulfilled, through Christ’s death on the torture stake. (Eph 2:15; Col 2:13, 14) It is true that Levitical priests continued serving at the temple in Jerusalem until it was destroyed in 70 C.E., but Christians from and after 33 C.E. became part of a new spiritual priesthood that was not supported by tithes.—Ro 6:14; Heb 7:12; 1Pe 2:9.
As Christians, they were encouraged to give support to the Christian ministry both by their own ministerial activity and by material contributions. Instead of giving fixed, specified amounts to defray congregational expenses, they were to contribute “according to what a person has,” giving “as he has resolved in his heart, not grudgingly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.” (2Co 8:12; 9:7) They were encouraged to follow the principle: “Let the older men who preside in a fine way be reckoned worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard in speaking and teaching. For the scripture says: ‘You must not muzzle a bull when it threshes out the grain’; also: ‘The workman is worthy of his wages.’” (1Ti 5:17, 18) However, the apostle Paul set an example in seeking to avoid bringing an undue financial burden on the congregation.—Ac 18:3; 1Th 2:9.
Cheers to you anyhow, and thanks for taking the time to leave us your thoughts. We're glad we made you think.
y u no like church?
...oh. oh yeah.
This is just one disquieting example among many. We obviously need a new paradigm - one that couples a genuine concern for human well-being with an unflinching honesty about moral and finantial accountability. The New Tithe is a good start to get people thinking. I hope it is widely viewed.
* time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,986794-1,00.html
i agree about the necessity of a new paradigm shift. perhaps the moral zeitgeist is lurching forward at such a slow pace that we don't notice it. i tend to think this recent resurgence of religious fanaticism is a last hurrah, not so different from the large jump in brain activity right before one dies.
If you can't figure out how your church is using your money, go to one that is open about where their money goes.
Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water.