Historically, the Bible has indeed proven extremely resilient in its historical accuracy with stunning archaeological confirmation:

Archeology: Digging for the Truth of the Bible - Dr. Don Patton - video
youtube.com/watch?v=NWawVUZg3Es

Dead Sea Scrolls - Dr. Don Patton - video
youtube.com/watch?v=AEa1dGHyDJY

Isaiah 53 and the Dead Sea Scrolls - verified prophecy before the birth of Christ
allaboutarchaeology.org/dead-sea-scrolls-2.htm

"In Extraordinary ways, modern archaeology has affirmed the historical core of the Old and New testaments - corroborating key points of the stories of Israel's patriarchs, the Exodus, the Davidic monarchy, and the life and times of Jesus
Jeffery Sheler - 'Is The Bible True', U.S. News and World Report, Oct. 25th, 1999, pg.52

This video is of interest to those who have ever been hit with this old question from atheists, ‘Why are there mythical unicorns in the Bible?’ (They were rhinoceroses!)

Of course there are Unicorns, pt.I
youtube.com/watch?v=aWHJMz2Neog

As well, there is actually very strong archaeological evidence tracing all human races to the three sons of Noah:

Tracing Your Ancestors Through History - Noah's Descendants - video
edinburghcreationgroup.org/ancestors.xml

TABLE OF NATIONS (GENEALOGY OF MANKIND) by Tim Osterholm
Excerpt: The fact is, that wherever its statements can be sufficiently tested, Genesis 10 of the Bible has been found completely accurate; resulting partly from linguistic studies, partly from archaeology, and, more recently still, from the findings of physical anthropologists, who are, to this day, recovering important clues to lines of migration in ancient historic times. As implied in verse 32 of Genesis 10, this Table includes everybody; meaning that so-called fossil man, primitive peoples (ancient and modern) and modern man are all derived from Noah's three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
soundchristian.com/man/

This following video, and article, are very interesting for they talk about the scientific evidence for a 'genetic Adam' and a 'genetic Eve', and how the evidence relates to Noah's flood:

Does human genetic evidence support Noah's flood? - Fazale Rana - video
metacafe.com/watch/4116168

Book Review; Who Was Adam?: A Creation Model Approach to the Origin of Man:
Excerpt: The Bible claims that there was a genetic bottleneck at the Genesis flood. Whereas all females can trace their ancestry back to Eve (through the three wives of Noah's sons), all males trace their Y-chromosomes through Noah (through his three sons). This predicted discrepancy for molecular dates of mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome data is actually seen in the scientific literature.
godandscience.org/newsletters/2005-09.html

The following videos outline some surprisingly strong geological evidence for a global flood that will make any honest person scratch their head in wonder:

Startling Evidence That Noah's Flood Really Happened - video
youtube.com/watch?v=KGeULHljDn8

This following article points to a global anomaly in sediment layers. A anomaly that would be expected from a global flood perspective:

Ancient Earth Smackdown at Santa Fe Tells Global Story - August 2010
Excerpt: “Geologist John Wesley Powell called this major gap in the geologic record, which is also seen in other parts of the world, the Great Unconformity.” Clicking on the link elaborates further: “The Great Unconformity is a geologic feature that exists across the world at a relatively consistent rock strata (or depth relative to sea-level).” Any unconformity worldwide in its extent would seem to require to a global catastrophe.
creationsafaris.com/crev201008.htm#20100810a

Worldwide 'planation' also points to a global disaster from water:

Planation surface
Excerpt: planation surface, any low-relief plain cutting across varied rocks and structures. Among the most common landscapes on Earth, planation surfaces include pediments, pediplains, etchplains, and peneplains. There has been much scientific controversy over the origins of such surfaces.
britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/462878/planation-surface

It’s plain to see - Flat land surfaces are strong evidence for the Genesis Flood
Excerpt: A planation surface is a large, level, or nearly level, land surface that has been ‘planed’ flat by running water. Scientists believe that running water cut these surfaces because they are covered by rounded rocks. Water is the only agent we know that can produce rounded rocks, by tumbling them against each other as it transports them along.,,, Planation surfaces sometimes cut across tilted sedimentary rocks. They are especially easy to recognize. The layered sedimentary rocks are often a combination of hard and soft rocks. Only a gigantic, fast-running water flow could have cut both the hard and soft rocks evenly.,,, Geomorphologist Lester King has documented that planation surfaces are abundant on all continents and found at different elevations. He noted about 60% of Africa is a series of planation surfaces. Some planation surfaces are located on the top of mountains.
creation.com/its-plain-to-see

This ‘global anomaly’ of a 'unconformity', and planation, is exactly what we would expect to see from a global flood perspective, yet the dating of the global catastrophe(s) from water, as far as I know, is not yet known to accurate detail. Indeed I know of no secular reference of any known ‘mass extinction’ that mentions any ancient global disaster for water covering the face earth, to form this worldwide 'unconformity' and planation. And yet, there the worldwide anomaly sits. An anomaly that certainly requires a global deluge to explain!:

The following video is very interesting for it shows a geological formation that is now known to have been formed by a catastrophic flood, yet Charles Darwin himself had 'predicted' the geological formation was formed 'gradually':

Where Darwin Went Wrong - geology video
youtube.com/watch?v=3darzVqzV2o

This following secular article 'honestly' admits that 'some big canyons' were formed by catastrophic floods:

Secular Geology Admits to Rapid Canyon Formation by Megafloods - June 21 2010
Excerpt: “Our traditional view of deep river canyons, such as the Grand Canyon, is that they are carved slowly, as the regular flow and occasionally moderate rushing of rivers erodes rock over periods of millions of years.” Quoting Michael Lamb of Caltech, co-author of a paper in Nature Geoscience, the article said that such is not always the case: “We know that some big canyons have been cut by large catastrophic flood events during Earth’s history.”
creationsafaris.com/crev201006.htm#20100621a

The following article investigates eight anomalies of the Grand Canyon that strongly suggest rapid formation by a catastrophic flood of global proportions:

Eight factual descriptions of the Grand Canyon
canyonministries.com/content/view/31/54/

Here is another anomaly of the Grand Canyon:

Grand Canyon Sand Hails from Back East
Excerpt: Sands from the Appalachians have found a tourist mecca in the arid Southwest, it seems. Two weeks ago it was reported that Utah’s Navajo sandstones came from the Appalachians, and now a geologist from Univ. of Arizona thinks the same for Grand Canyon sandstones, He bases his conclusion on radiometric dates of zircons in the sand which match those in Appalachia. This would require huge rivers bearing sand thousands of miles westward to Wyoming, “from whence winds blew it south into the dune fields” of Arizona. The resulting sand pile covered an area the size of the Kalahari desert. “I was very surprised by what we found,” said one of the geologists.
creationsafaris.com/crev0903.htm#geo71

Here is a site that, though written from a Young Earth perspective, gives a fairly good overview of the many strange anomalies in the fossil record that point to an ancient global flood:

The Fossil Record
detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html

Yet to be fair here is a paper outlining some fairly reasonable objections to a global flood (of note: Dr. Ross's 'Reasons to Believe' ministry has endured a fair amount of 'mudslinging' from other Christians for holding to the 'local flood' theory):

Noah's Flood: A Bird's-Eye View - Steve Sarigianis
reasons.org/astronomy/noahs-flood/noahs-flood-article-1

The following videos have some fairly persuasive archaeological, and even geological, evidence that the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt actually did occur:

Exodus Revealed part 2 - video
youtube.com/watch?v=9bJ5JdBd4QU

The Exodus Case Interviews with Lennart Moller - video
prophecyinthenews.com/the-exodus-case-interviews-with-lennart-moller/

The Exodus Decoded – Part – 1/4 - video
youtube.com/watch?v=AjKyRoyIjjw

The following video is downright eye-opening with its evidence for authenticity of the Bible:

The Physical Ashen Remains Of Sodom and Gomorrah - video
youtube.com/watch?v=FwTVFk1HK3Y

Here are some videos defending the Bible as an ancient historical text;

Defense Of The Historical Jesus From Supposed Higher Criticism Of Biblical Text And Historical Reliability - William Lane Craig
vimeo.com/11144955

The (Bart) Ehrman Project - several videos defending various Biblical texts and Historicity of Jesus
youtube.com/user/ehrmanproject

These following videos, and quotes, show, that as far as the historical evidence itself is concerned, Jesus assuredly rose from the dead.

The Historicity Of The Resurrection Of Jesus - William Lane Craig - video
youtube.com/watch?v=JYdzUYyIKMM

History proves Christ’s resurrection - article
c-bstatesman.com/news/2011-03-03/Church_News/RISEN.html

The Case For Christ - Lee Strobel - video
sv.cross.tv/32489

Consider these following quotes on the historical Jesus:

A British agnostic once said “let’s not discuss the other miracles; let’s discuss the resurrection. Because if the resurrection is true, then the other miracles are easily explained; and if the resurrection is not true, the other miracles do not matter.”

Sir Edward Clark — a prominent lawyer in Great Britain “As a lawyer, I have made a prolonged study of the evidences for the resurrection of Jesus Christ. To me, the evidence is conclusive; and over and over again in the high court, I have secured the verdict on evidence not nearly so compelling. The Gospel evidence for the resurrection I accept unreservedly as the testimony of truthful men to facts that they were able to substantiate.”

Canon Westcott — for years a brilliant scholar at Cambridge University “Indeed, taking all the evidence together, it is not too much to say that there is no historic incident better or more variously supported than the resurrection of Christ. Nothing but the antecedent assumption that it must be false could have suggested the idea of deficiency in the proof of it.”

Thomas Arnold — Professor of History at Oxford University; author of a 3-volume history on ancient Rome “I have been used for many years to study the history of other times, and to examine and weigh the evidence of those who have written about them; and I know of no fact in the history of mankind which is proved by better and fuller evidence of every sort, to the understanding of a fair inquirer, than that Christ died and rose again from the dead.”
awordfromtheword.org/what-if.htm

“I humbly add I have spent more than 42 years as a defense trial lawyer appearing in many parts of the world and am still in active practice. I have been fortunate to secure a number of successes in jury trials and I say unequivocally the evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ is so overwhelming that it compels acceptance by proof which leaves absolutely no room for doubt.”
Sir Lionel Luckhoo. A British lawyer knighted for his work. He won 245 consecutive cases.

“Let [the Gospel's] testimony be sifted, as it were given in a court of justice on the side of the adverse party, the witness being subjected to a rigorous cross-examination. The result, it is confidently believed, will be an undoubting conviction of their integrity, ability, and truth.”
Simon Greenleaf from his book “Testimony of the Evangelicals”. Greenleaf was one of the founders of the Harvard Law School who wrote the book “A Treatise on the Law of Evidence”. He was an atheist until some students challenged him to examine the evidence for the resurrection of Christ.

"I know men, and I tell you that Jesus Christ is not a man. Superficial minds see a resemblance between Christ and the founders of empires and the gods of other religions. That resemblance does not exist. There is between Christianity and whatever other religions the distance of infinity." - Napoleon Bonaparte
christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/november/28.74.html

"I am trying here to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: 'I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't accept His claim to be God.' That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic -- on the level with the man who says he is a poached egg -- or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to." – C.S. Lewis - Mere Christianity, pages 40-41

Loading more stuff…

Hmm…it looks like things are taking a while to load. Try again?

Loading videos…