
That's Christmas!
11 months ago
We all know about the real Christmas. Don't we? Mary and Joseph. Away in a manger. Donkey. 3 wise men and the shepherds. Of course you do. You probably even played a shepherd or a wise man when you were 5.
Now you're older and it's all Noel Edmunds, booze, bills and unwanted visits to relatives.
This film brings Christmas back to it's roots. The real Christmas. Where the manger mings, the baby cries and where a star really shone. The Christmas that is for everyone, everywhere.
Starring:
Chris Tapp, Dr Paul Barnett, Jane Hewitt
Directed By:
Francis Annan-Burton
Produced By:
Vijay Henderson, Andy Pearce, Matt Streatfield
Now you're older and it's all Noel Edmunds, booze, bills and unwanted visits to relatives.
This film brings Christmas back to it's roots. The real Christmas. Where the manger mings, the baby cries and where a star really shone. The Christmas that is for everyone, everywhere.
Starring:
Chris Tapp, Dr Paul Barnett, Jane Hewitt
Directed By:
Francis Annan-Burton
Produced By:
Vijay Henderson, Andy Pearce, Matt Streatfield
-
Vimeo: About / Blog / Developers / Jobs / Community Guidelines / Community Forums / Help Center / Site Map / Merchandise
/ Get Vimeo

Previous Week
I was considering burning this to DVDs and handing them out as tracts, but I would first of all like your permission and second of all, like to know about the broken link.
I probably won't check vimeo very often but feel free to email me a estoydemoda@gmail.com
thanks :)
Happy Christmas.
An interesting video. But why no mention of Constantine and the Council of Nicea which was where the decision of HIS birth and its timing was decided. The timing of Xmas was not decided by the Gospels but in 325 AD at Nicea. Xmas or "Yule" was formerly a pagan festival, and like many Christian churches being built on former pagan sites, so Constantine placed the celebration of Ieshuouah's birth on an important pagan festival. Christianity extols the Nicene Creed so why not the historic facts within it.
Kindest regards
Ray Hudson
Liked the video. Is it possible to get the 3 min version as a download too?
Kind regards
vimeo.com/download/video:86633095?e=1229530585&h=fbbdce677752fbaaccbf13a89bb5426e&uh=5b5f2bef5b3d1ce9376377ffcd2b33d7
It would be great know where you're playing and to who just out of interest.
Happy Christmas!
- Delighted for you to use it
- Make sure you attribute it to St Helen's Bishopsgate (showing the film to the end is probably easiest)
- Don't alter it
- Don't charge for it
:)
1. Register for free at vimeo.com
2. Go to the link vimeo.com/2549637
3. At the bottom right you'll find a link to download the full HD version.
4. Download and save it to your computer.
5. Play to your friends, granny and the cat.
I would like to Digg this... it would be particularly useful for there to be a digg link on the St Helen's/xmas site itself.
Blessings.
Pete M
Scroll down. There's a digg link on the share panel at the bottom of the page.
Cheers.
The early church never celebrated the nativity of Jesus - most likely because He is the one whos goings forth are from everlasting (Micah 5:2). Should Christians be looking to syncretise something that has its roots in Babylon? Is this not spiritual adultary?
Please have a look at this teaching from Last Trumpet Ministries: Christmas: The Hidden Reason of the Season
video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1861647673385647049&hl=en
'And you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free' John 8:32
every blessing
Or perhaps because nowhere in the bible is there any command or indication that Jesus' birth should be celebrated anyway?
The first point to bear in mind is that there is NO non-biblical confirmation for the Nativity. In fact, much of what we do know of the time contradicts the biblical account. It's doubtful, for example, that Jesus was even born in Bethlehem because the only evidence of a census is one conducted by Quirinius, but that did not occur until ten years after the death of Herod.
Another point worth consideration is that, despite Andy Pearce's conclusion, there really isn't any 'compelling stuff' said in the bible about the Nativity. Mark & John don't mention it at all, while Matthew & Luke are different in almost all respects; Luke has Gabriel, Caesar's decree, a manger & shepherds, the presentation at the temple, etc. Matthew has none of this; he has a house, a star, Magi, gifts & concludes with the escape to Egypt & the slaughter of the innocents etc. Luke makes no mention of these.
And of course, nowhere in the bible is there any reference what-so-ever to a stable, 'wise men', the number of Magi, the date of Jesus' birth, etc.
This may help:
sthelens.audiop.org.uk/downloads/download/51394/TU08-050.mp3
I agree what you said regarding how human tradition has changed the biblical accounts of Jesus' birth. However if it were all a lie, which is the big point I think you're trying to make, then the detail of events that is in the gospels / eye witness accounts would expose them as fiction.
Quirinius' census would have taken over ten year to complete which explains the timing mis-match. The talk I've posted above explains that a bit.
What evidence have you to suggest that Jesus wasn't born in Bethlehem? Don't you think the residents of Bethlehem would contest the gospel accounts if they were false?
This is real flesh and blood history about the real Jesus who walked the earth and who reigns as King now.
Thanks for engaging with the film. Hope you've found it useful.
Happy Christmas.
Your explanation that Quirinius' census would have taken over ten years to complete is merely attempt to explain the discrepancy in chronology; it's just a surmise, a guess on your part, but without foundation.
Joseph and Mary lived in Nazareth, and Jesus is often referred to as "Jesus of Nazareth". They had no reason to make the difficult journey to Bethlehem, with Mary heavily pregnant. The obvious conclusion then is that he was born in Nazareth, so why do Matthew and Luke say he was born in Bethlehem?
The New Testament wasn't written until after Jesus had died; some of it not until decades after his death, and the authors would have drawn on a variety of sources for information, including the Old Testament. So when Micah 5:2 says a great ruler shall come from Bethlehem they would have been in no doubt that that was where Jesus originated. It's not that they were lying (as you suggest), it's just that, in the same way that you are misinterpreting the gospels as historical fact, so they did with the Old Testament.