More
See all Show me
19. A+E Ident Screen
11 months ago
16. Norman?
1 year ago
14. PEARL 6
1 year ago
10. Kalkan Market
1 year ago
7. Gold Dust
2 years ago
A light hearted film Written by Ray Ford and which I directed after a short film making course I attended this time last year. The course was seven Saturdays from September through October.
Filming was all done on one day which shows somewhat and with a budget of next to nothing. I guess all in all, it was a fun experience.

Thanks to everyone at First Take Liverpool and everyone in the making of 'Norman?'

Warning, contains some bad language.
  • Greg Wallis 1 year ago
    GREAT! Now THIS is what makes British shorts the best in the world IMO. Short, sweet, fun, and engaging. I bet you just loved doing this. (And I'm SUPER envious.)
  • Wayne Avanson plus 1 year ago
    well, it was just a silly little story that we had fun with. Although on the day I had a streaming cold and it was hard going there for a while. Some of the shots are pretty poor but like I say, we had one day to get is all in the can!
    Cheers Greg. If you want to do something like this yourself, get in touch with the local Am Drams and get something written, they love to do films, trust me!
  • Greg Wallis 1 year ago
    I've been thinking about am drams for some time, but wasn't really sure about the best approach; this gives me food for thought, so thanks.

    (And I think this short is better than maybe you think it is. Don't talk it down, it's really rather good.)
  • Wayne Avanson plus 1 year ago
    hmm, perfectionism is hard work… :-)

    I've been involved in amateur theatre for twenty years or more and they're a friendly bunch and like to show off so getting them interested in doing a short is easy. It's winter show season so you could go along to a few plays/shows and note some names of good actors from the programme.

    You can usually find them in the bar later, that much you can count on.
  • Wayne Avanson plus 1 year ago
    Oh, the other thing is, the actors are usually members of more than one society so you can get who you think are the best actors/most suitable from various societies. PEARL has actors from three different ones, but they all know each other as they've all been involved for years.
  • Greg Wallis 1 year ago
    Interesting, I'll bear it in mind for a project in the new year. Watch this space... (but toilet breaks are OK.)
  • Wayne Avanson plus 1 year ago
    gee thanks… oops gotta go now…
  • Wayne Avanson plus 1 year ago
    I have some scripts here which didn't get chosen to be made if you want to peruse them… If you don't fancy writing your own that is. We can always get permission to use them if you like one of them.
  •  
  • SB 1 year ago
    Wayne,

    Great stuff again. Well, I got my HD7 and was wondering what settings in Visualhub you use (MPEG-2?) to convert .MOD to .MOV for use in FCP. If I use MPEG-2 (not the 1080i preset), I can import in FCP but I need to render the video (orange line on timeline).

    Any help is appreciated!
  • Wayne Avanson plus 1 year ago
    Hi SB

    I use MPEG streamclip and have just been experimenting with Apple HDV1080i50 at 1920x1080 and the file sizes are roughly similar to the TODs and pretty damn good quality.

    Steve Mullen's HD7 Handbook is a pretty good companion to this camera. You can download it here

    home.mindspring.com/~d-v-c/GZ-HD7.htm

    and there's a good forum here with loads of help for everyone.

    dvinfo.net/conf/mpg2-jvc-everio-gz-hd-series/

    Steve Mullen recommended Apple INtermediate Codec at 1440x1080 but it makes huge files and I can't see any better quality myself
  •  
  • SB 1 year ago
    Wayne,

    Thanks. I tried the QT -> Apple Intermediate Codec route and it works, but the files are getting quite large as you said.

    I will try the HDV1080i50 later today. Hopefully the transcoding is relatively fast on my quadcore.

    Yes, I registered at that forum, but it doesn't allow me to start a new thread. Also it seems that everybody is 'keeping the secret for themselves' on how to work with HD7 in FCP.

    Anyway, I will start experimenting away with my new cam. So far the only issue is importing files. For the rest this seems like a top of the line consumer cam!
  •  
  • SB 1 year ago
    Wayne,

    I just tried MPEG Streamclip and out put to HDV1080i60 (NTSC). If I do 'Get Info' on the resulting .mov, it says it is 1920x1080. However, when I import to FCP, it seems to be interpreted as 1440x1080i (Item Properties->Format).

    Any idea? Good thing is the conversion time isn't too bad and requires no rendering in FCP. Bad thing is, I really would like to see the full HD of this cam...
  • Wayne Avanson plus 1 year ago
    Hey SB

    I'm fairly new to all this video malarkey myself and what I've discovered in my learning of the past year or so is that there's much more to it than just the file size, sensor size has more to do with image quality/resolution than file size and the quality of your lenses too. The only way to see best quality out of the cam is to stick an HDMI lead into an HD TV. Everything else is a compromise of file size/quality. You can work in great high quality codecs like Apple ProRes422 HQ but your file sizes would be ten times the size of HDV nearly and your hardware wouldn't be able to cope probably and then you'd still have to compress it quite a bit to get something you could use in the real world (ie uploading to vimeo)

    I personally don't see any difference between the 1440 and the 1920. Steve Mullen, a chap who studies these kinds of things agrees but says that the diagonals are perhaps ever so slightly sharper at 1920. You really should download/buy his eBook, there's no secret to using the TOD files in FCP you either copy to your hard drive and convert them into somthing useable (1080i50/60) or whatever, or film in 1440CBR, make a playlist in the cam then 'capture' the footage as HDV like you would if you had a tape based HDV camera like a SONY A1. There is another way that STeve explains in his book that uses iMovie 08, but I haven't tried that because I don't have iMovie 08.

    So, top and bottom of it is, don't sweat the 1920 or 1440 thing, the camera is excellent for a consumer camera especially in Manual mode, and so long as you are getting great pics, it doesn't matter what size the files are. In some ways, larger files just make problems for you.

    Would it be easer if JVC had opted for a standard MPEG format? YES of course, but they went for a higher bitrate/better quality resolution with less compression on the file, which I think makes this a great little camera.

    There are 'easy setups' for the JVC Everio for FCP somewhere on the net but I can't remember where. If I find it, I'll post the URL. These become available in your easy setups menu in FCP. They may help.

    In fact I have the files here if you want to send me your email address, I'll just fling em over to you.

    Hope all this helps

    Avey
  •  
  • SB 1 year ago
    Wayne,

    Thanks for this info! I agree, in the end its the resulting image that counts, not the filesize, codec pixels etc. (of course, they are part of the mix and as you said, it can make your work difficult).

    I tried the ProRes HQ and indeed, filesizes go 10x, but I have quite some GB and GHz to spare and I can work nicely with them on the FCP timeline.

    I came to the conclusion (preliminary, after 1 day of playing) that any MPEG compression needs a render on the FCP timeline. MPEGStreamclip "Convert to MPEG" option is very fast, resulting file is high quality (at first sight) and imports well in FCP, but it needs rendering all the way along.

    I still have to try the 1440CBR L&T option in FCP and will compare final out with FHD, but my feeling is that there would be hardly a difference.

    I already found those presets, I believe they are all based on HDV and or AIC, both requiring rendering up to 1.5x real time. This is doable and in fact I have been working with RED footage lately and to be honest although HD7 / FCP is a pain, I prefer it over the RED workflow (which also seems to be in a continuos state of flux).

    Thanks a lot for your help, one thing is for sure, this is a great cam but the workflow could have been easier if JVC was more considerate for their Apple customers!

    Now I will focus on getting some nice footage.
  • Wayne Avanson plus 1 year ago
    Nice one! I always find the HD7 works best in good light (Like most consumer cams) but more than that, it's the light that 'makes' the shot. All we can do is capture what Nature is doing and hopefully, capture it well.

    Just one thing from what you write above is that when I stick a file on the timeline for the first time, if my sequence isn't set with the same codec, it asks me if I want to 'change the sequence settings to match the clip' I always say yes usually as this negates the need for rendering and can make a quick and dirty edit very easy to do.

    Here, I can use the ProRes 422 Codec with my MacBook Pro 233 attached to a fast FW800 Terrabyte hard drive, but when it comes to using Magic Bullet Looks for grading, it just won't play. Says I haven't enough resources. poo. Otherwise I'd use it all the time from 1920 footage ProRes422 is recommended in another cool eBook I bought called 'The HD Survival Handbook' by Philip Hodgetts. He says it takes grading well, unlike HDV. Well, since I haven't enough resources, i doubt I'll be able to find out.

    Look forward to seeing your stuff SB.
  •  
  • SB 1 year ago
    Yes, I also always click 'yes' when FCP asks to change seq setting to match footage. However, for MPEG-2 footage, it doesn't provide this option. Strange, as I am sure the MPEG-2 codec comes with FCP 6. I think the difference between codecs like ProRes or AIC etc. is that they are intra-frame compressed whilst MPEG-2 is interframe (i.e. info from a bunch of frames is needed to construct a particular frame). This could be why MPEG-2 footage requires rendering (=decompression in this case?).

    Yes, also I have to pre-render most Bullet looks for them to play at realtime. This is because most of those filters require a lot of processing and even a quadcore isn't up to do that real time. You should be able to see individual frames aren't you (place the playhead and just wait until it renders that frame). Normally, I do the grading just prior to render out, after picture lock.
  •  
  • Tracy Lundgren 1 year ago
    Well that gave me a chuckle. Silvia indeed! And she had such nice hands.....at first :)
    Well done!
    I didn't see any "bad" shots.
    There used to be a show on over here called "eat carpet" - a selection of weird and whacky short films.
    I used to love watching it!
    Unfortunately it's not been aired for a long time.
  •  
  • Wayne Avanson plus 1 year ago
    glad you liked it Tracy.. Just a bit of fun to finish up the short film course. It was more an exercise in working with a team in a film making situation like they would professionally. They made us organize everything, Production Manger, 1st AD, sound, sound assist, camera, lighting and script editor.

    I was the cameraman on two others of the five that were produced. I think I enjoyed that more than the directing.
  •  
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.

Advertisement

Statistics

  •  
    plays
    likes
    comments
  • Total
    plays 298
    likes 2
    comments 18
  • Jan 1st
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 31st
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 30th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 29th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 28th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 27th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 26th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 25th
    plays 1
    likes 0
    comments 0
Previous Week

Downloads

Please join Vimeo or log in to download the original file. It only takes a few seconds.