
Quantitative easing
10 months ago
Now the Federal Reserve has effectively cut the target lending rate to zero, it only has one more weapon in its arsenal. Quantitative easing. Senior Editor Paddy Hirsch explains what this “nuclear option” it is, and what the Fed hopes it’ll do. More coverage of the financial crisis is at marketplace.org/financialcrisis
-
Vimeo: About / Blog / Developers / Jobs / Community Guidelines / Community Forums / Help Center / Site Map / Merchandise
/ Get Vimeo

Previous Week
This solution simply ‘spends’ new money into circulation rather than ‘lending’ it into circulation. It will immediately provide ‘liquidity’ without more debt, without more taxes and turn our financial crises around, directly helping we the people with the money going directly to the producers first.
The money supply increases with productivity gains. No inflation! No new debt! No new Taxes! Tax reductions! Liquidity! Cash Flow! High-paying jobs! Commerce! Life!
Let’s stop beating the ‘special interest debt horse’! Loaning all new money into circulation and the resulting unpayable, compounding debt it creates has almost killed us. More borrowing will only make our growing problem worse. One cannot pay debt with more borrowed money and get rid of debt. Money produced, as a representation of wealth to all of society is the only workable, just and true solution.
We gave our Congress the authority to “coin money” and to “provide post roads”
‘Spend it’ don’t ‘lend it.’
1. The Fed increases bank reserves by either granting discount loans to banks (this is at .5%) or by buying up their holdings of gov. securities. The banks then may be buying up securities off the open market. This is not different than an open market operation.
2. The Treasury must borrow by issuing gov. securities in order to buy up the "toxic" assets of the banks, which the banks are buying up to replace these assets. These may be the treasuries that the banks are selling to the Fed.
3. None of these actions will necessarily increase the money supply until the banks start to lend to the private markets.
4. At this point all that has happened is an increase in bank liquidity. If this gets converted to market liquidity, then this can lead to market inflation which will first be reflected in a decline in the dollar's value in the international marketplace.
5. If we get the inflation implied by this increase in liquidity, then this can only be ended by a major recession. This may be what happens next.
The solution to the sub prime crisis and our overall ‘borrowing problem’ was decided to be ‘more borrowing’ from the banking industry, the very same banking industry that caused the problem and that seemed to be having difficulty making loans. However, that same industry found it easy to create $700 Billion in new money as a loan to our government. Then, our government ‘gifted’ the money to the banks on behalf of the public. Now, we, the taxpayers and good, efficient workers, must see increased taxes to repay the ‘gift’ to the banks.
Government has only two sources of income, borrowing or taxing. If government borrows, it borrows money that was already created as a loan to someone or it borrows newly created money directly from banks. When government taxes it is really just taxing money the people have gotten through the lending process. In any case, the debt must constantly grow.
About October 11-12, 2008 the British government decided to back all European bank loans—even questionable or bad loans. It instructed the banks to make loans; make loans to anyone; even those who may not be able to pay them back. The ‘Government’ would back those loans. If the Government has to make good on bad loans, it must do so with money.
Where will the money come from to repay those bad loans? It must borrow money that was already created as a loan to someone or it borrows newly created money directly from banks.
This recent example of more debt upon debt is no true and lasting solution. The banking industry simply gains more and more control and ownership of everything while the overall indebtedness, hardship and destruction keeps growing. Some temporary relief may result. But, without a totally new direction, the frequency and severity of money problems will increase.
The Solution is to create and spend new money into circulation as a debt-free payment for building and maintaining roads and bridges, production that unquestionably benefits all of society mutually.
Federal and State legislation has been written to guide the process. Contact your Senator and Representative today! Debt money is dead.
Gord0 says, "Greg, your arrogance is only exceeded by the stupidity of your money-printing solution. Was your last job the Chief Central Banker of Zimbabwe?"
We do not print money. Federal Reserve Notes are not available for direct delivery to the public. They are only available from your local lending institution by writing a check for cash and paying for them with check book money (book keeping entries created on the ledger of a bank as a loan).
Why do you seem to take the position that 'money' created as a loan against a promise to do future production is ok but creating it as a payment for current production is not?
My phone number is 507-440-1015.
I take no position on the desirability of any one money printing and distribution scheme over any other. And neither does Paddy Hirsch in this excellent whiteboard presentation.
Could we get back to basics first? Could you please explain in detail;
1. What do we use for money?
2. How is that money created?
3. How is the new money put into ciruclation?
Thank you
Gregory K. Soderberg
507-440-1015
My experience has been that in the subject of money, most have no answers and most often redirect to someone else or suggest more research and study. Why must I get an answer from someone other than the person I asked?
Gregory K. Soderberg
1. What do we use for money?
Money is the most marketable commodity. Mises defined money as "the most marketable good which people accept because they want to offer it in later acts of impersonal exchange" (Human Action).
What falls within this definition is open to debate. I consider the following to be money:
Cash
Demand deposits with commercial banks and thrift institutions
Government deposits with banks and the central bank.
2. How is that money created?
Money is created when the Federal Reserve purchases assets (generally treasury bills) from the banks using newly created money.
3. How is the new money put into circulation?
When the banks receive the money described above it *is* in circulation. The banks will invest, loan or spend that newly created money as they see fit.
Plea for an Adventure in a New World Economic Order
Adam Smith, Karl Marx, John Maynard Keynes and Alan Greenspan: a Unified Perspective
Abstract:
This tract makes a critical analysis of credit based, free market economy, Capitalism, and proves that its dysfunctions are the result of the existence of credit.
It shows that income / wealth disparity, cause and consequence of credit, is the first order hidden variable, possibly the only one, of economic development.
It solves most of the puzzles of macro economy: among which Business Cycles, Stagflation, Greenspan Conundrum and Keynes' Liquidity Trap...
It shows that Adam Smith, John Maynard Keynes, Karl Marx and Alan Greenspan don't contradict each other but that they each bring a meaningful contribution to a same framework for understanding macro economy.
It proposes a credit free, free market economy as a solution that would correct all of those dysfunctions.
In This Age of Turbulence People Want an Exit Strategy out of Credit, an Adventure in a New World Economic Order.
Read It. edsk.org/
What commodity does the Federal Reserve use to buy treasury bills?
It sounds like you are saying that we the people, through our government, must be in debt before any money is created, is that what you mean?
How do the banks receive the money that the Federal Reserve creates, do they get it at no cost?
The banks don't get something for nothing. They merely sell treasury bills that they own for cash.
I don't maintain that this is an optimal situation; in fact, I would prefer that there were no central banks. Central banks are threats to economic liberty. Unfortunately, however, the current system of central banking is not going away. The best that we, as individuals, can do is to understand the threats to our well-being that central banking and fiat currencies represent and to act accordingly to mitigate these risks to the extent possible.