FOSSILS REFUTE DARWINISM
8 months ago
Newer
Newer
Older
8 - 10 of 17 videos
Channels / Albums
A fossil is the remains or traces of a plant or animal that have been preserved in the Earth's crust down to the present day. Fossils collected from all over the world are our most more... important source of mation about the species that have existed on Earth since life began. All these specimens manifest one single truth: Living things did not come into being through the fictitious processes of the theory of evolution, but were created in a single moment.
Please Join Vimeo or Log In if you want to comment. It only takes a few seconds.
-
playslikescomments
-
Total
66
2
12
-
May 17th
0
0
0
-
May 16th 0
0
0
-
May 15th 0
0
0
-
May 14th 0
0
0
-
May 13th 0
0
0
-
May 12th 0
0
0
-
May 11th 0
0
0
-
May 10th 0
0
0
Previous Week
Referrers +
Please Join Vimeo or Log In to download the original file. It only takes a few seconds.
- Vimeo: About / Blog / Developers / Forums / Help! / Site Map
- Legal: © 2008 Connected Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved. / Terms & Conditions / Privacy Statement
If you insist on the fossil record accounting for every single transitional species, you create an unwinnable condition for any advocate of evolution. There would be so many fossils on earth that you wouldn't be able to take two steps without tripping over one. The earth would be covered with fossils.
Say you have to walk 10 feet. Before you can do this, you have to walk 1 foot. After which you have to walk to the 1.1 foot mark, then 1.11, then 1.111 feet, then 1.1111, and so on. Since there are an infinite number of distances to cover between 0 and 10 feet, you would never be able to complete it.
The same could be said about trying to walk from 0 to 0.00000001 feet.
Therefore, no human being has ever moved!
The issue isn't so much that it's step 1.000...1 to 1.000....2, but rather Step 1 to MILE 26.2 (macro-evolution). Something else is part of the equation. Scientists call this something, "chance/luck" (growing 13 mile tall left and right legs) while Christians/Muslims believe/have faith it is God (in the form of the Boston Subway system - See Rosie Ruiz).
And Jakob, it's interesting how you think asking macro-evolution theorists to "prove" it by showing even a 100th of the possibilities is unwinnable. Should that mean we can't hold to account macro evolution theorists as we do creationists?
Vimeo may not be the proper forum for a debate on this issue, but I am proud to see that the comments are NOT mean-spirited.
Someone build a freaking time machine already. Although if the 'Tower of Babel' taught us anything, we'd probably be scattered and all coding will be jumbled (therefore no more Vimeo)
E-GAD!
Faith.
Dalas, you rocked in "Cameo."
The same argument explains the development of complex organs, such as eyes: Evolution is an experiment on a broad basis, so there is a good chance not only to develop all the minor changes that are required to form an eye, but also to have some individuum combine all of these features to really have an eye. As having an eye is a real advantage in our world, a species with an eye will spread much faster than one without, so after a short while all the individuums that have not developped this great feature will be gone. The result looks as if an eye has been created from nothing.
I'm sorry to say that, but most of that creationist stuff looks to me like an oldschool version of "It has been on TV, so it must be true". Nothing is true because it has been written in whatever book, be it the bible or Qu'ran. Think a little for yourself.