In light of the recent spate of super hard trad climbing ascents in the UK we've decided to hold a 'Question Time' style debate at ShAFF to discuss the unique British Grading system. To some it's the perfect system, explaining more about a route than any other, but to others, especially when it comes to higher end grades, it clouds things and causes confusion. Should cutting-edge ascencionists be grading for the hypothetical on-sight at the same time as having the said ascent videod and thereby rendering the pure on-sight impossible to any viewers? Does a climber's 'experience' on a route affect its grade? Just how responsible are the media and sponsors when it comes to the rush of reporting a major new route, and what effect have internet forums had on their moderation? On Sunday 1st March at ShAFF Nick Colton of the BMC will chair a debate between the following panel of cutting edge climbers: Dave Birkett, Lucy Creamer, Jack Geldard, Nic Sellers, Steve McClure, John Dunne, James Pearson. Questions will be taken from the audience. Unfortunately John has headed off to DR Congo working with the UN so has had to pull out of ShAFF this year. He won't be giving an illustrated lecture as indicated in the programme and he won't be on the panel of the Grade Debate. However he will be sending us his thoughts by video so he'll be there virtually at least! Apologies if this causes you any hassle.