
FilmFellas - webisode 6
9 months ago
"Mumbling to a Generation"
Film buffs take note: Webisode 6 delves deep into the heart of Mumblecore, as cast two reveals the origin, tenor and target audience of the movement.
Joe Swanberg, Susan Buice and Kris Swanberg reminisce about their experience at South By Southwest in 2005, where four different filmmakers came with similar projects that inspired the press to dub them "Mumblecore." Steve Weiss argues that Hollywood's missed the boat by not marketing films that speak to the current generation. Though all three young filmmakers insist that they only create art for themselves, Steve eventually gets them to reveal their own use of focus groups, comprised of close friends and festival audiences. "If you fail to communicate, then you've failed as an artist," Susan concludes.
Film buffs take note: Webisode 6 delves deep into the heart of Mumblecore, as cast two reveals the origin, tenor and target audience of the movement.
Joe Swanberg, Susan Buice and Kris Swanberg reminisce about their experience at South By Southwest in 2005, where four different filmmakers came with similar projects that inspired the press to dub them "Mumblecore." Steve Weiss argues that Hollywood's missed the boat by not marketing films that speak to the current generation. Though all three young filmmakers insist that they only create art for themselves, Steve eventually gets them to reveal their own use of focus groups, comprised of close friends and festival audiences. "If you fail to communicate, then you've failed as an artist," Susan concludes.
-
Vimeo: About / Blog / Developers / Jobs / Community Guidelines / Community Forums / Help Center / Site Map / Merchandise
/ Get Vimeo



Previous Week
As for the mentioned films, i've seen them all except Mutual Appreciation and surely enjoyed them a lot. So keep them coming!
I can't wait for the next episode...
Good Stuff!
I get what they are saying about doing films for yourself as a director, but then changing it because others don't get it, is something I don't understand. The question is where is the movie you wanted to make? Which version is it? Is it the one that every screening audience made, or yours?
I make my films based on one thing only. The way I want it to come out. No matter how many people like it, it is my art. I hope people like it, but if they don't why should I care? Everybody sees things differently, and I'm unique in my perspective. I totally believe that the only real way to find yourself as an artist of any kind is to learn every technique you can, and then hone your approaches based on what you want to see, and nothing more. Thats to be a pure artist, not a commercial one ( which I have zero interest in ). I believe that if you stick to your own approach regardless of feedback either way, then it is " possible " that you will find a TRUE following of your work. An audience that knows what you do, what you offer, and that you will do the next art based on exactly what you want to do. That consistency gives the audience more of a feeling of admiration, and respect in the long run.
It may be a financial disaster for you if nobody responds to your art, but keep plugging away if the art is what is important about what you do. Otherwise you will become a slave to others. Then it becomes more appropriate to call yourself an entertainer, not an artist. (which is fine if thats what you need). I don't need acceptance, or money. I'm into filmmaking for the self expression of the way I see the world. If somebody out there likes it or is inspired by it THAT is the highest honor. Knowing you really do have people out there that share your vision.
OUT......
Say you decide that you're a cookie maker, and you learn a few things about the craft and think you've gotten pretty good, then you make a batch of chocolate chip cookies and personally enjoy them. Then you share them with some friends who are really REALLY into chocolate chip cookies, and they say "these cookies aren't great, I think you almost got it right, but if you did (such-and -such) differently they'd actually be better," if you don't take their feedback you're simply a bad & stubborn cookie maker and nobody will want to eat your cookies. The other thing is, I can almost guarantee no matter how stubborn you are, or how hard you try, the next batch of cookies will be made with the cookie connoisseurs' insights in mind.
Changing something because you've learned a way to make it better doesn't make you any less of an artist....in fact quite the contrary, it makes you a responsive artist who cares about what they are making, so much that they are willing to make changes to better their art.
Regardless, I like some of the stuff you do and am glad you are making things you love.
cheers!
-zack
This is a touchy subject. Is art somewhat of a collaborate venture or not. To Joe, Susan & Kris, they all have multiple directors on their projects, so to some extent that makes them collaborative artists. I personally, would never do that. Jens, my DP and I are a bit more old school and work our shoots more military style. I communicate with my DP and he communicates with his crew. The crew answers to him, not me. That avoids a lot of confussion of "he said this". Joe has told me how on "Kissing on the Mouth" they had four directors and I just freak thinking about how that would work. But their projects come together on set very collabratively and it works for them. Do what works for you. In webisode 7 and 8 they talk we talk about this more.
The cool part Rick is that you have the option to release your projects without any sort of changes to them. Five years ago, we really didn't have the web as a viable option for spreading video content. In other words, we wouldn't be having this converstion right now without the web. So the web gives you this capability. Use it. I commend you for sticking to your principles.
I think to some extenet if you want to have a Hollywood release you have to be willing to give up some of that control, if not, you have the web and self distribution. To each, his own.
My hats of to you Steve, as well as Joe, Susan & Kris (and who could for get your Crew!).
I LOVE this topic you guys started here about the final choices of the Film. I've enjoyed this debate for years now. I've sat through this argument with varying results;
* One night we laughed, joked and had the entire problem solved (and I’m pretty sure we solved all of the Worlds problems that night as well, but no one wrote anything down… Dohhh!)
* And then one night the debate got so passionate and heated there were almost punches thrown (I told them Tequila & Gin are NEVER a good combination!).
Anyway, for my 2-cents worth, it really comes down to that deceivingly simple question, "Is it working?"
* I know what I "wanted" to do before we started Production.
* I think I remember what we "did" during Production.
* And now I'm putting together everything I actually "have" and I'm trying to stay as true as possible to my original "vision" of the story.
For me, I only seem to get into real significant trouble whenever I obsess too much on what it was I “wanted” instead of focusing my energy on what it is I actually “have” in front of me. But in the end, it’s ALWAYS about whether or not it’s working. I just don’t know HOW you can really be sure without letting people (audiences if you can get ‘em) watching and “constructively” criticizing it for you. (I LOVE the cookie-maker analogy, by the way!)
One thing is for sure… no one is EVER going to talk me out of believing that every Production is absolutely dependant upon good collaboration. And it doesn’t matter if your running the tightest “Ship” on the lot with an impeccable chain-of-command in place, or if you’re runnin’and’gunnin’ with 12 Directors all ridding in the same van. Film “IS” Collaboration (sorry, and so is TV… sort of).
If you find yourself dead-set against collaborating and too set in your ways to change that particular mind-set… well then, I would recommend you get into Photography or maybe Painting.
Sounds like Rick doesn't care if anybody likes his cookies or not. They're his cookies.
However, if Rick wanted to sell his cookies he might need to change his recipe.
Darn it, now I'm getting hungry!
and i will totally agree with discovering content/trying to find an audience for your own material on the web is really hard and seems to be random luck. just gotta find the right venue or person to start the wildfire. ha.
You touched on it here but i would like more on the editor as director or how editing works for new generation of viewers, is this something coming up in a future episode?
This is really motivating stuff, i am looking forward to the next webpisode.
We are planning on talking about how the editor can essentially be the writer with regards to documentary filmmaking.
Future FilmFellas casts are going to be:
Documentary film
Wedding filmmakers
Short films
Distribution models
Balancing Artistic/Business models
If you or anyone has any other ideas for subjects for future FilmFellas, please let me know.
Steve
I really appreciate that these young film makers are putting themselves and their work out there, and taking the artistic risks and all, but at some point it all comes back to the old saying that you can do anything in this business, but you can't do anything alone. That's a bit of a generalization, but you get the point.
I do think that the whole idea of communication is subjective. What communicates to me would fall dead on my parents - so the issue would maybe be that its choosing the right generation to communicate to that is important. Especially if you have a desire to see it on the big screen.
I liked the methods in films such as Gran Torino that bring 20 years old hatred into the modern day with all the new generations running around. It was probably the most diverse cinema audience i have ever sat with to watch a film.
Maybe more like "Goodfellas meets Indiewood"
We realize Hollywood wants nothing to do with us.
steve