Scribbuluminous is presented to the public as a preliminary element of a larger more dynamic installation.

At this stage and without conceptual reasoning it is primarily presented It is an exploration into using the gallery as a canvas. However by juxtaposing the structural forms with an overlay of improvised free-form light it could be seen as an attempt to create the beginnings of a hybridised 'digital yet physical', 'static yet dynamic' multi-dimensional environment.

Developments can include ventures deeper within this conceptual paradox with active augmentation of the space through the construction of moving architectural spaces and the integration of a projected virtual volume within them, assisted with camera perspective tracking.

Could this raise questions of the theoretical and known position of these elements and the dynamic of interdimentional interplay? With the addition of the observer this 'cloud' of interdimensiality does this extend to the consciousness?

On a personal note the development of this system (in terms of back end programming) paled in comparison to the level of programing that was required for the Dataflux 0.1 installation. This allowed me the experience of producing a gallery installation without requiring a deep level of focus and stress, allowing me to freely improvise. I wanted to create a new media installation that utilised programming methods but also a large element was based around spontaneous instinctive creativity. It was this idea that is presented in the scribbles (scribbles are reported to allow one to witness the mind frame of the scribbler). It is this mind projection that references back to the ultimate development of a entirely choreographed environment based on user interaction.

Because I continued to develop the work within the space as it was open to visitors, I was witness to the reactions of people when the walked into the space and saw the work, and their reactions to me as I was in my two modes of thinking (logical and sequential when I was programming and random and intuitive when I was scribbling).

The enterance to the installation is covered with a black sheet. One visitor actually peeked inside and saw me when I was programming and did not enter. I also heard another girl outside the door say to her friend that she was too scared to enter even though they had not looked inside yet, however her more daring friend urged her to continue by sarcastically stating that they would not enter, they eventually did. Another visitor that came into the gallery had an in-depth conversation with me about her perspective of the work, what it represents to her and what imagery it conjures up whilst another visitor stood still in a confused state for a long period of time whilst darting her head back and forth to follow the scribbles throughout the room. This visitor stated that they are confused as to what and how 'this' is happening.

All of these people were witness to me within the room and my state of mind when working on the two elements that make up this installation. These are the software programs that drive the hardware and the improvisation of the scribbles. These separate times presented me as either irritated and confronting or relaxed and engaging.

The outcome of the scribbles are also based on the layout of the room. It is these spatial parameters that transform the scribbles into a textural component of the room, as I am aware of this while I am scribbling, this displays that my mind frame is not completely free and a certain amount of concentration was required.