00:00
9741
More
See all Show me
11. Alternative Economy Cultures part 1
2 years ago
The ‘Alternative Economy Cultures’ (alt.econ.cult) programme on April 3rd & 5th, brought together leading international and Finnish thinkers, cultural practitioners and activists, to present alternative economic visions, during Pixelache Helsinki Festival 2009.

The seminar aimed to tackle not just the financial, but the social, cultural, institutional, human, material, emotional and intellectual forms of capital. Not just about individual gain, boosting, balancing or bail-outs, but common good, peer-to-peer, shared wealth and appropriate reward for effort involved.

The discussion-based workshop about peer-fundraising brought together artists, researchers and business representatives interested in P2P funding models. Focusing upon emerging practices and related topics, it also raised the topic: Can the crowd-sourcing phenomena be applied to support alternative cultural events in Finland?

The programme was initiated and organised by artist-researcher Andrew Gryf Paterson (independent / agryfp.info / Medialab TaiK), in cooperation with Marita Muukkonen & Ivor Stodolsky of Perpetuum Mobilε (perpetualmobile.org) and Roope Mokka of Demos Helsinki (demos.fi). We aimed to offer a new strand to the Pixelache Network discourse.

For more info: 2009.pixelache.ac/festival/programme/alternative-economy-cultures/

.

Friday 3rd April, 10.00 - 18.00

FULL 1-DAY SEMINAR

Cultural practitioners, activists, and economic theorists from Finland and abroad, working from different contexts, strategies and institutional backgrounds, were invited to contribute to this theme.

Michael Albert (US), Michel Bauwens (BE/TH), Geraldine Juárez (MX), Tapani Köppä (FI), Kristoffer Lawson of Scred (FI), Wojtek Mejor (PL), Saija-Riitta Sadeoja of Porkkanamafia (FI), Oliver Ressler (AT), Sara Sajjad of Piratbyrån (SE), Felix Stalder (AT), Tere Vadén (FI), and Eero Yli-Vakkuri of Uuva Project (FI).

Likes

See all likes
  • John Stephens 2 years ago
    It seems doubtful that this revolution will get anywhere since the strengths of comparative advantage, specialization, and entrepreneurial leadership have been rejected in favor or mediocrity.

    Good thing. It's pleasant to know that our cars, architecture, and bikes are designed by engineers who are fully trained and specialized in that task.
  •  
  • Brit Bunkley 1 year ago
    I would think that John is perhaps one of those 20% Mr. Albert was talking about (those who feel a bit superior to the rest of us). He also didn’t listen to Albert’s explanation of creativity and expertise. Capitalism does not lead to excellence and efficiency any more than it leads to individual wealth - witness BP for instance. (It sometimes does lead to wealth – more to do with luck than initiative or hard work – many work hard and escape wealth…and more often it leads to strife, poverty and/or undue stress.)
  •  
  • Brit Bunkley 1 year ago
    However I did play this video for students. One (feminist) student said he “lost” her when Michael talked about taking an example as a factory owner he pointed to the man (instead of the woman) and then he kept using the work “he”. What about shy people in these meetings?
  •  
  • Partial Order 1 year ago
    John Steven's comment does not seem to relate to what Albert advocates. Albert does not argue against specialization; balanced job complexes do not imply everyone doing everything. As a research scientist I don't see how spending a few hours a day sweeping up etc. would stop people from performing well in more technical work. Parecon does not bar personal or regional specialization, or excellence and creativity for that matter.
    Comparative advantage? What a joke. If the US had practiced what it now preaches to developing nations it would be doing a roaring trade in bear skins and fish today, and not much else. The fact is that no developed country used previously existing comparative advantages to get ahead.
  •  
  • @ John Stephens & Partial Order

    Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel have written quite extensively about efficiency concerns relating to participatory economics. Thoughtful analysis on this subject can be read for example in Michael Albert's
    Parecon – Life After Capitalism and in Robin Hahnel's Economic Justice and Democracy – From Competition to Cooperation.

    There is a good case to be made that market systems allocate resources very inefficiently, in a much more gigantic scale than would ever be possible in a participatory economy.
  •  
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.

Advertisement

About this video

MOV
02:42:21
  • 640x480, 964.95MB
  • Uploaded Tue April 07, 2009
  • Please join or log in to download

Statistics

Date Plays Comments
Totals 11.5K 30 5
Feb 15th 3 0 0
Feb 14th 4 0 0
Feb 13th 2 0 0
Feb 12th 2 0 0
Feb 11th 4 0 0
Feb 10th 5 0 0
Feb 9th 9 0 0