
Canon 5d MKII Test with Singh Ray Vari ND
7 months ago
Testing the Singh Ray VariND with various Canon EF lenses on the 5d Mark II.
Setup: Singh Ray VariND 82mm
Caemra: Canon 5d MKII
Lenses Used: All Canon EF lenses - 24 1,5 16-35 MKII 2.8, 50 1.4, 85 1.2, 135 2.0
Indoor, I was able to shoot incredible low light footage with manageable control over the aperture with no additional glass. I was surprised to find out that outdoor was going to be the more challenging environment. After lots of reading, I came to realize that the only way to shoot bright days is with ND filters if you want any form of control over the iris. After more reading, it became clear that the easiest way is to use a VariND which will give me the flexibility of losing 2 to 8 stops.
Well, here are sample shots I did yesterday at around 10am. My kid was still vegging at home when I dragged him to Vazquez rocks. As you can see, he looks sleepy. LOL!
I used step up rings for most lenses to use the 82mm VariND. My first disappointment was the 24mm. As you can see, vignetting was a problem. This is with a 77 - 82 step up ring. Oh well, sigh... The 16-35 mkII did ok after maybe about 25-36mm. All the others were just fine.
I know some of the shots are out of focus or over exposed but that was just operator error and first time use. I'm also busy making sure my babies do not fall of a cliff. (Babies - my cute kid and my 5d). ha ha ha!
In the end, I concluded to myself that there is no other way I'd shoot outdoors in daylight without the Singh Ray VariND. It made it really easy to dial in the aperture and iso I'm trying to set and lock - not to mention it would not be possible to get any kind of shallow DOF without NDs.
Yes, there's the vignetting on really wide angle lens @ 26mm - bummer for my 24 1.4 which is one of my favorite lens. but it's really all about finding the limitations and working with what we have. So if I need a 16mm shot, I just don't use the variND. Ill put in a circular polarizer and use deep depth of field. Nothing wrong with that. I had some problems with initial focus assist sometimes but I think I should focus first before making it dark.
So now that I have the VariND, I can't live without it. That's what I got out of this fun little test.
I'm sure there's a lot I didn't cover so feel free to ask any questions. I do not work for any of these products I mentioned.
Setup: Singh Ray VariND 82mm
Caemra: Canon 5d MKII
Lenses Used: All Canon EF lenses - 24 1,5 16-35 MKII 2.8, 50 1.4, 85 1.2, 135 2.0
Indoor, I was able to shoot incredible low light footage with manageable control over the aperture with no additional glass. I was surprised to find out that outdoor was going to be the more challenging environment. After lots of reading, I came to realize that the only way to shoot bright days is with ND filters if you want any form of control over the iris. After more reading, it became clear that the easiest way is to use a VariND which will give me the flexibility of losing 2 to 8 stops.
Well, here are sample shots I did yesterday at around 10am. My kid was still vegging at home when I dragged him to Vazquez rocks. As you can see, he looks sleepy. LOL!
I used step up rings for most lenses to use the 82mm VariND. My first disappointment was the 24mm. As you can see, vignetting was a problem. This is with a 77 - 82 step up ring. Oh well, sigh... The 16-35 mkII did ok after maybe about 25-36mm. All the others were just fine.
I know some of the shots are out of focus or over exposed but that was just operator error and first time use. I'm also busy making sure my babies do not fall of a cliff. (Babies - my cute kid and my 5d). ha ha ha!
In the end, I concluded to myself that there is no other way I'd shoot outdoors in daylight without the Singh Ray VariND. It made it really easy to dial in the aperture and iso I'm trying to set and lock - not to mention it would not be possible to get any kind of shallow DOF without NDs.
Yes, there's the vignetting on really wide angle lens @ 26mm - bummer for my 24 1.4 which is one of my favorite lens. but it's really all about finding the limitations and working with what we have. So if I need a 16mm shot, I just don't use the variND. Ill put in a circular polarizer and use deep depth of field. Nothing wrong with that. I had some problems with initial focus assist sometimes but I think I should focus first before making it dark.
So now that I have the VariND, I can't live without it. That's what I got out of this fun little test.
I'm sure there's a lot I didn't cover so feel free to ask any questions. I do not work for any of these products I mentioned.
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.
Hey, there are 9 more comments in
2 groups
-
Vimeo: About / Blog / Developers / Jobs / Community Guidelines / Community Forums / Help Center / Site Map / Merchandise
/ Get Vimeo

Previous Week
Am interested in a VariND myself. I have a few NDs and would usually pile them up to make it deeper, but the result alters the picture colour slightly. I would be interested to know what density values the filter goes from and to, and which ones you dialled in for each of the shots. (does it have values marked on the side of the filter so you know what value you're using or not?
The Bokeh at 1:29 is surreal! Makes it look like a severe Gaussian Blur in photoshop…
2 stops = .6
3 stops = .9
4 stops = 1.2
5 stops = 1.5
6 stops = 1.8
7 stops = 2.1
8 stops = 2.4
You can actually push it more but not recommended and may cause unexpected results since they really callibrated this thing. Yes, there are markers from minimum to maximum so you can repeat the settings. For each shot, I just went by feel and could really have dialed them better if I had more time. I do feel I have enough control with minimal hassle and know it's limits to do an effective shoot. Thanks. Ronnie
Avey
I can understand a CPL but not ND. Also where you using a slim filter ?? Because those dont vignette
I use slim filters for my wide lenses - anything wider than 26mm. Anything > 26, doesn't seem to vignette with a normal standard filter. If you look at the 1st scene,, there is vignette using my 24 1.4.
I dont understand at all.
Id be very keen to see some A to B tests in different outdoor environments with and without the ND's.
keep up the great work.
Beginning of:
vimeo.com/4585632
and video parts of:
vimeo.com/4586100
Ronnie
Did you always film with a wide open aperture? For some reason I liked the blurry 50mm footage best :)
I´m gonna buy a GH-1 and the kitlens there is pretty slow. It´s f4-5,8. So I want to use it wide open for DOF. Do you think a 6stops filter is enough for that? I was looking into that Vari-ND but unfortunately they don´t sell the in Europe and ordering from the US is pretty expensive and I would have to pay additional tax.
So I also was looking into a B+W ND 106 like Tomas above.
I also plan to use fast Canon FD primes (50/f1,4 and so on) with adapter. For them I´m gonna buy a B+W ND 110 which gives me 10 stops...
do you think this could work out?
thanks a lot! :)
Hi. No, I don't always shoot wide open. I was simply testing how to achieve shallow DOF in bright light conditions. In fact, in a lot of cases as you will see with feature films, it's not really that common to have such a narrow dof. To tell a story, most of the time, you need to also show what's around you. Save those shallow DOF for more personal and closeup shots. A 6 stop will definitely help and be good enough for the lens you mentioned. The BW 110 will definitely work. The only hassle will be taking it off while framing so you can see what you are shooting then putting the nd on after framing. You may also consider making a varyND yourself. I've seen some good results stacking a circular polarizer on top of a linear polarizer. I know there are optical problems on the extremes but may work well if you mark the min/max just as the singh ray varind does. Good luck.