Wow, I wouldn't say that. In fact it looks much better, because of its resolution, latitude and depth of field than any of the HDV footage uploaded to vimeo.
pasman, sorry to say but your guess is wrong. POLPLANELLS, you should make a 720p version of the video and upload it here at vimeo, they allow resolutions up to 720p, will look a ton better on here
Wow, this looks great. I wish they allowed for a full 4k upload here on Vimeo. That'd be insane. We're shooting a movie and we just tested the 2k at 100 fps with the Red One. The shot came out amazing.
The video depends on many factors apart from the camera, such as lighting or whatever. But anyway, if you recorded this same video with an ex1 you would notice the much poorer quality
Hmmm, the depth of field looks more refined overall. But, I hate to say this, i've seen the HVX200 with a Brevis adapter look just as good. I do agree though, lighting, composition, etc. does make a humongous difference. But if you look at some of Philip Blooms work done with simple regular old digital cameras, it looks simply amazing. I've heard alot about the Reds, and have seen a lot of footage done with it. If you're shooting for the big screen, Red is definitely the way to go. But for anything DVD or less, it's over kill. Yes, technology (adapters, etc.) have become that good. I find the biggest issue with regular prosumer cameras with adapters, is the lighting, etc. But if you control your shots and are careful, the quality is superb. Either a Red, HVX200, Sony, whatever, if you know how to shoot, I've seen guys create work you'd swear was done on 35mm. Then I've seen guys have the most tricked out of setups, that looks like junk, simply because they don't know what they're doing. That's where the true art of motion pictures comes into play. Video, Film, it's all motion picture.
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.
And, just as any consumer HDV camera I guess?