
1. Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed - Boom Mic (juicedLink, Zoom H4n, Microtrack II, BeachTek)
2 years ago
In Part 1 of Canon 5D Mark II Audio Exposed, I compare the Microtrack II, Zoom H4n, BeachTek DXA-5D, and the juicedLink CX 231 when recording a closely placed shotgun mic.
The only processing of the comparison audio was changing gain to match levels. You can download the uncompressed comparison audio here: p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/AudioExposed_Part1_Boom.zip
Don't miss...
Part 2: Camera Mounted Mic - vimeo.com/5388476
Part 3: Wireless Lavalier - vimeo.com/5443143
Part 4: Foley - vimeo.com/5453690
Part 5: Noise - vimeo.com/5474562
Part 6: Conclusions - vimeo.com/5903379
The only processing of the comparison audio was changing gain to match levels. You can download the uncompressed comparison audio here: p3pictures.com/audio_5d2/AudioExposed_Part1_Boom.zip
Don't miss...
Part 2: Camera Mounted Mic - vimeo.com/5388476
Part 3: Wireless Lavalier - vimeo.com/5443143
Part 4: Foley - vimeo.com/5453690
Part 5: Noise - vimeo.com/5474562
Part 6: Conclusions - vimeo.com/5903379
MP4
00:02:46
15 Related collections
- Categories / Canon
- Categories / HD
- Film School - Filmmaking
- Canon 5D MKII videos
- Canon 5D MKII
- ULTIMATE 5D MK2 CINEMA
| Date | Plays | Likes | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Totals | 39.5K | 190 | 45 |
| Feb 14th | 19 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 13th | 18 | 1 | 0 |
| Feb 12th | 32 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 11th | 25 | 1 | 0 |
| Feb 10th | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 9th | 29 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 8th | 25 | 0 | 0 |
Check out these lessons to learn more about how you can make videos like this one!
-
Vimeo: About / Blog / Developers / Jobs /
Community Guidelines /
Help Center / Video School / Music Store / Site Map
/ Vimeo
or
-
Legal: TM + ©2012 Vimeo, LLC. All rights reserved. / Terms of Service / Privacy Statement / Copyright

Prev week
I have a previous test at 10dB analog and 12dB digital in camera with the BeachTek set in stereo mode here: vimeo.com/5256305
I think with the Zoom one needs to either enable the low-cut (wind cut) filter (which might make it sound thin), or spend money on a serious wind cut solution, which can cost hundreds of dollars. Once you encase the mic, that will cut the wind, but will also cut the highs and lows.
Certainly, the H4n is clean and kicks the Microtrack II up and down the field.
Regarding sync, if you put the 5D2 footage on a 30p timeline, you don't need to do any rate changes to sync it. In fact, you can drop it on a 29.97 timeline, the video will drop frames and the audio will sync fine.
However, if you re-conform the video so it slows down to 29.97, then you need to slow the audio as well.
Cineform does this all automatically. The (internal) audio and video are both slowed by 0.1% so you can do 29.97 with no dropped frames and no sync problems. It can cause problems if you try to intercut with other cameras though.
BTW, I edited these videos with a previous version of Cineform that retimes the video, but doesn't touch the audio. I then manually reset the video to 30p to maintain sync. Since this is an audio test, I wanted the audio untouched (except matching gains.)
You don't work with any of these companies? This is totally independent research on your part?
Microtrack II: I own it and have used it on a short film.
Zoom H4n: Was provided for free for one day from Brian Valente of Redrock Micro.
BeachTek: My friend owns it locally, and loaned it to me.
juicedLink: The owner of the company provided it to me for evaluation.
Magic Lantern Firmware: I'm beta testing it. The firmware is free under the GPL framework.
I own or borrowed all of the equipment used to make the videos.
I don't work for any of these companies and there is no cash involved.
The summary is recorded indoors with the NT1-A through a Mackie mixer into an Audiophile 192 and was not processed.
Note that you might hear some clicks on the Magic Lantern recordings both through the juicedLink and the BeachTek. I was so focused on noise and tone that I overlooked this. The clicks are loudest when there is a high signal. They go away when the signal is low. This is due to the firmware writing to the audio chip - it zeroes out the waveform for an instant. The 0.1.5 beta code fixes this. Hopefully, it will be released in a matter of days...
If you don't want to run the ML firmware, you might consider recording through the juicedLink into a cheap DV camcorder. As long as the camcorder lets you control the gain, the results would be better than into the 5D. A friend of mine is shooting a documentary that way using a Rode NT-2, juicedLink and HF100 camcorder. All the video is from the 5D, using the built in mic audio for sync.
And then there's the H4n, which is a really solid solution.
What again was the model of Sennheiser shotgun you used in this test?
Thanks.
:-)
I haven't used the AT897, so I can't really comment.
thanks
I like how you found a way to drink beer while working.
Is your camera relatively new?
Too bad. Any solutions ?
What firmware are you running? If you upgraded from the 1.1.0 firmware, that might be a problem. But I don't think ML would work at all then. Just a thought.
Just what I needed. I'm in the process of buying a 5dmrkii and I'm researching audio. Very good suggestions. Thanks again.
That means that Magic Lantern will no longer be required to get good sound. (Maybe we will still want it for the headphone output. We will see.)
The juicedLink will still be needed to get a good hot signal into the camera for low noise, but those who prefer the stock firmware will now be able to have great in-camera audio.
basically if you are using canons firmware beachtek is ok, if your using green lantern, go with juicedlink, and turn the gain down...
i have a 7d, will beachtek do for me? is canon updating our firmware too?
The better solutions would be the juicedLink with the DN101, or the newer Beachtek with active preamps. The DN101 kills the auto-gain, provides a headphone output and small meters. I haven't tried the new Beachtek, so I don't know if its preamps are clean, but it's gotta be better than the passive one.
Hopefully, either Canon or Magic Lantern will develop 7D software that can defeat the ALC and provide the other features. Until then, you can get the DN101 from juicedLink. It attaches to your preamp, gives a headphone output, and injects a noise signal into one of the channels that forces the ALC down. It's also got a small meter, so you can see if you have a signal present.
You can use the CX231 and 7D right now, and the sound will be pretty good, but you'll have to deal with gain (and noise) pumping in post. With the DN101 (or future firmware), you'll be good to go.
:D
Weren't you sending the boom mic's XLR output into the H4N and using it simply as a digital recorder?
If so, I don't see how wind noise could have been a factor - any wind noise would have been coming from the boom mic not the Zoom H4N unless you were expecting the Zoom to somehow further filter the wind noise out.
By the way, there is a great, inexpensive line of wind shields for the Zoom that are both humorous and very effective, check out redheadwindscreens.com/
my main question is, would i have to get a separate mixer if i'd like to use the zoom h4 or microtrack on my 7d, in order to override the AGC issue?
I would stay away from the MicroTrack II though. It's very noisy. The H4n and the Tascam DP-100 are both good external recorders.
im using the 7d on a doc and sound is super duper important. lol and i know what a clapper is ;)
thanks for the help :)
But it seems like you need the JuicedLink to help with the pre-amp. I currently have a sennheisser EW122 wireless lapel mic for interviews. The receiver has some adjustable gain controls- would this be enough to get decent audio running into the mic jack? Or would I still need a preamp to help?