
Hoffer on The Destruction of the Human Spirit
4 months ago
This is a brief morning video looking at an aphorism by Eric Hoffer. This aphorism relates to, as I see it, the consequences of being caught up in the "knowing mode." Let's ask some relevant questions!
-
Vimeo: About / Blog / Developers / Jobs / Community Guidelines / Community Forums / Help Center / Site Map / Merchandise
/ Get Vimeo

Previous Week
I think there is a big difference from what we do when we question things and what children do when they question things. When being a kid, a lot of questions haven't got even the most tentative answer. Therefore, they're coming from a state of total bliss (of course, they too have their assumptions and biases...some concept-making machinery is just hardwired into us).
We, on the other hand, can only come from a position of knowing but setting aside, or knowing but being open (at least partially) to other answers. We can never, if we're not having a stroke or something similar, go back to a state were answer A and answer B are both as likely to answer question C.
I guess that's just something we have to accept and acknowledge.
In my opinion, it is always good to question and criticize our current knowledge. If the criticism is wrong, you will strengthen your arguments and understand even better why the position you take is plausible. If the criticism is right, you get a more accurate view of the world. If the criticism is inconclusive (which most often is the case), you probably get a little bit of both.
People for example tend to turn to New Age to find some kind of mystery that they can marvel at. This is not because the things that fascinated these people in their childhood have been solved and that they now have knowledge (e.g. Is the universe infinite?). It's because they've come to grow accustomed to the world they see everyday. Things that once were mysteries have become mundane and to get exited over the world, one has to move up, finding something that's a mystery again.
We come to this world, marveling over it's existence. In pace with our growing acquisition of it through perception, we aquire the skill to make more or less accurate predictions about it. The first time you fall in love, the feeling is extraordinary and half of your time goes into wondering how something ever could feel so strong. The second time around you know what to expect and soon, the predictions we make is in accord with the actual outcome, thereby focusing our attention on other things in the world. What once were a great mystery still is, but we learn to ignore it.
Come to think of it, it really comes down to how you define knowledge. My epistemologic view is a quite skeptical one, so I guess this reasoning makes sense for me.