There is something really quite interesting about the setting up of binaries in her provocative piece: we versus them; engineers versus financial folks; electronic activists versus them. At some point, it seems like "we" need to determine who the "we" is and how we are all implicated in the progress of technology, for good or bad. The open source movements are interesting examples of this type of energy, though it's often the case that poor design and implementation are encouraged precisely because of the revolutionary power of the free and open "we." This promises to be a very interesting discussion. Apparently, this conference is refocusing a great deal of my own thinking on fundamental definitions.