More
See all Show me
15. Cloudscapes
2 years ago
13. Walking the Merlin
2 years ago
I received my Steadicam Merlin yesterday - steadicam.com/handheldmerlin.html

Purchased from B&H:
bhphotovideo.com/c/product/382099-REG/Steadicam_MENNN_Merlin_Camera_Stabilization_System.html (800 USD).

I have tried to set it up both with standard battery and no accessories and as in this footage with my Kenko 0.5x wideangle lens. It seems a little harder to get perfect balance when the wideangle is installed but that might just be me. There was little wind in the forest, so the conditions were OK.

I'll write up a short list of my Merlin settings in a few days for anyone else who want to get a Merlin as well. I highly recommend it.

It took me a couple hours to set it up the first time. However, I did follow the manual and the DVD as adviced, so that's part of the reason. Now I understand the different settings and what effect they have. I can go from using wideangle to using just the camcorder in 5-10 minutes. It's not easy but don't expect it to be too hard either - just be patient with it and try to understand how it all works.

Enjoy the footage. It's 25p (PAL) in TV mode at 1/250 shutter speed. More contrast and color correction added in Sony Vegas Platinum 8.0d.

Music: Carl Nielsen "Symphony No. 5"

5 Likes

Tags

  • Tiago Pierotti 2 years ago
    Nicely done Rico!
    is it perfect balanced? cause i saw too much horizontal movements, feels like we're in a boat.
    try to have the perfect balance to eliminate that and will be perfect:)
    Cheers
  • [ PIXEL VIKING ] plus 2 years ago
    Yes, I need to practice balancing it and holding it too. It's not easy but I'll learn eventually :)
  • bigd1971 2 years ago
    Very nice scenery. I thought the location was beautiful. It looks like you have the same problem with the Merlin as I do. I find it very hard to eliminate the pendulum motion. Starting a new movement or changing direction makes the camera swing back and forth. From what I read in the manual, this is caused by bottom heaviness.
    But I think it is also a matter of skill. It will take a lot of practice and fine tuning to get it just right. We are both learning to "fly". How cool is that. Nice job Rico. I look forward to seeing your improvements and I will share my trials with you.
  • [ PIXEL VIKING ] plus 2 years ago
    Exactly. First of all, I guess we need to learn how to start and stop with more grace :) (slower, that is) and secondly, we need to be more agressive on the 'guide' without overdoing it.

    Since it has to be bottom heavy to work, I don't think we can avoid the pendulum effect 100%. Patience is a virtue :)

    In the end, getting these results for "only" USD 800 is a good deal, I think.

    I'll be flying off to 'Hollywood North' (Vancouver) in two weeks - maybe they can teach me something :)
  • bigd1971 2 years ago
    Well have a fun and productive trip. Keep on flying.
  •  
  • Bo Lorentzen plus 2 years ago
    Rico - its all in the star and end of the movements, think cup full of water. I actually got a lot out of running around with a cup of water filled to the top... Trust me if you want people to think you have lost it, this is the perfect way to start.

    Det er virkeligt et yndigt land. Tak for turen.

    Bo
  •  
  • Tim Warneka 2 years ago
    Marvelous! It does look like you're floating. Safe travels to Vancouver. :-)
  •  
  • Jeronimo Gadea 2 years ago
    I think it's a quite good first try!
  •  
  • James Chegwyn 2 years ago
    Ive heard about the merlin, How much was it?( if you dont mind me asking)

    I need to get a better steady cam, I had a look at the 'flycam' Which looks quite nice.

    & the first shot is amazing, Really smooth.
    It must of been pretty heavy right?

    James.
  • [ PIXEL VIKING ] plus 2 years ago
    It cost USD 799.95 + shipping (USD 75.-) from the US to Denmark.

    The Merlin is very light and with the HG10 installed, it weighs only about 1.5 kg. Obviously, the heavier your camera the more counter weights you have to add.
  •  
  • Alan Hughes 10 months ago
    Were you zoomed in a bit? I'm thinking of buying a .5x wide angle, but I'm use to a .3x on my old camera and what you shot here doesn't look like any distortion at all.
  • [ PIXEL VIKING ] plus 10 months ago
    I believe that I was zoomed all the way out. The cheap Kenko 0.5x that I used here does give you soft edges. Pay a little more and you will get a much better result. Raynox seem to make some nice lenses but don't buy the cheapest one :)
  • Alan Hughes 10 months ago
    Ya I had a raynox .3x for my old camera, it had allot of color/blur vignetting but I really liked the amount of distortion I got with it

    vimeo.com/609676

    All I can find for the 43mm thread on my new cam though are .5x's and I was hoping you were zoomed in some on this video so could expect to get a bit more distortion/wideness with a .5
  •  
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.

Advertisement

2 Related collections

Statistics

  •  
    plays
    likes
    comments
  • Total
    plays 1,560
    likes 5
    comments 13
  • Dec 7th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 6th
    plays 3
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 5th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 4th
    plays 1
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 3rd
    plays 3
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 2nd
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Dec 1st
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
  • Nov 30th
    plays 0
    likes 0
    comments 0
Previous Week

Downloads

Please join Vimeo or log in to download the original file. It only takes a few seconds.