00:00
5437
This video is a critique of catastrophic man-made global warming theory, based on presentation slides used in a series of public presentations and debates in late 2009 and early 2010. The author is Warren Meyer, author of the web site climate-skeptic.com.

While the world has almost certainly warmed since the end of the Little Ice Age in the early 19th century, and while it is fairly clear that CO2 and other greenhouse gasses may be responsible for some of this warming, climate alarmists are grossly overestimating the sensitivity of climate to CO2, and thus overestimating future man-made warming.

While the theory of greenhouse gas warming is fairly well understood, most of the warming, and all of the catastrophe, in future forecasts actually comes from a second theory that the Earth's climate system is dominated by strong positive feedbacks. This second theory is not at all settled and is at the heart of why climate models are greatly over-estimating future warming.

Note: Charts last updated Jan 2010. The earlier live version of this video has 8000 views on Vimeo.
  • Doron Dekel 1 year ago
    The clearest and most methodical presentation I've seen of the arguments against taking any climate-related political action for the next couple of decades. I've done some independent research of my own and reached exactly the same conclusions (and I'm a "lefty" Canadian engineer - not even close to being a libertarian). Canada's "do nothing" past policy in this matter appears the most rational. I hope it would not be derailed by changes in US policy.
  •  
  • Richard Warren 1 year ago
    Very well presented.
  •  
  • Steven Lawrence 1 year ago
    Enjoyed this very much. Since I can fault nothing in the facts of the presentation, here are a couple of meaningless FYI nit-picks:

    Firstly, I live in China, and the masks some people were wearing during the Olympics (and still wear all over China, even in the clear-aired mountain regions) had nothing to do with air pollution, but was (and still is now) a holdover from the SARS scare.

    Secondly, two really nit-picky picks: "short-lived" is pronounced with a long "i" sound (rhymes with "court hived"), and "data" are plural -- "But the data says" should read "but the data say"...

    Once again, great job!

    EDIT: The only reason for the nit-picks: I am a perfectionist by nature, but that isn't why. I really just hate to see something of substance (like this) disregarded, or torn apart as its own red herring by the real nit-pickers of the world, who fool themselves into thinking they have addressed points, when all they have really done is dismiss it on the basis of semantic usage or something equally trivial or meaningless.
  •  
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.

Advertisement

About this video

WMV
01:30:37
  • 640x480, 203.23MB
  • Uploaded Wed January 20, 2010
  • Please join or log in to download

Statistics

Date Plays Comments
Totals 33.2K 22 4
Feb 14th 22 0 0
Feb 13th 29 0 0
Feb 12th 45 0 0
Feb 11th 30 0 0
Feb 10th 89 1 0
Feb 9th 121 0 0
Feb 8th 22 0 0