- Known Issues 6
- Bugs 1946
- Feature Requests 1229
- Projects 441
- General Discussion 1474
- Technical Help 1232
- Cameras 255
- API 126
Please check the Help page for general FAQ, video tutorials, and other helpful information.
This conversation is missing your voice. Take five seconds to join Vimeo or log in.
We recommend starting a Group for projects so users can collaborate and see all the videos in one place.
- Vimeo: About / Blog / Roadmap / Developers / Community Guidelines / Forums / Toys / Help! / Site Map
- Legal: ©2008 Vimeo, LLC / Terms & Conditions / Privacy Statement




.
Shooting it normal would be easier, because I could control really finely tweak how the end product looks. On the other hand shooting it out of focus would probably have a more organic feel.
Software is not a problem, I'm running Final Cut Express and I'm sure it can handle something like that.
Right now I'm leaning towards shooting it out of focus, but I want to get some other people's input.
Thanks!
In general I say do as much 'in camera' effects as possible. This goes for any effect, really. Just look at Michel Gondry's work (especially on his short films) if you plan ahead and do stuff for real it looks MUCH better.
Gondry mentions (in a commentary on one of his dvds) a film either he or someone else made in which they dimmed all the lights on a set instead of doing a simple fade to black in post. You can imagine the depth of the fade, where each piece of furniture became dark individually... shadows increased and darkness engulfed everything instead of just a stale post production fade. I mean, this is an extreme example but do you see my point?
I ramble, bloop.