Dan Cava

Watching this debate was a frustrating experience. As a Christian, I enjoy when an intelligent atheist gives good food for thought. Hitchens failed on every account. He never answered a straight question. He railed against evil without ever defining it. When asked about celluar irreducible complexity, he non sequiters by saying there was a time we didn't know about cells. When asked about the purpose of life, he makes jokes. He attacks organized religion when asked about biology. He rejects what he feels is an intangible, unprovable God, replacing it with an intangible, unprovable inner daemon. No logic, no scientific appeals, only harrumphing, snide remarks, empty witticisms, ad hominem attacks, a deplorable lack of eye contact, and an apparent ignorance of the causality of lavalier microphones. I find Hitchens' so-called intellect to be simply incredible.