Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong

Header video for the Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong playlist here in vimeo, and also to the one in Youtube, same name. This (9/15/09 Markintro.wmv) video introduces the 'Quelle' Gospel Hoax, my satirical song. I wrote the words to an old Windows 95 rendition of 'a-roving'.

The rest of the playlist material shows a) that the Q people admit they want to create a hoax, and b) how you can PROVE Mark's Gospel is third. All ya gotta do, is READ it ALONGSIDE the other books which came out the same Year of the Four Emperors. Duh.

Full Mark playlist is here: . View it with the Synoptics and Royal Family of God series, because Book of Hebrews uses Mark's Gospel as its OUTLINE: what a shock, the writer of Hebrews combines Peter and Mark's Gospel to create an interactive outline for his points, which are FIRST based on Psalm 110 and Jeremiah 31. So the RFG series will be extensively developed over 2015, to demonstrate that (assuming I live that long).

For some 'scholars' have long contended that the Gospels are all partial 'copies' from one common source they came to call 'Q'. Some think Mark is this source, so erroneously place his Gospel as the earliest. Some others think all of the Synoptics are essentially copied from some earlier source, thus calling the Divine Inspiration of the Gospels, into question.

The egregious liars called the 'Church Fathers' -- inventors of the Pope lie -- lie about Peter and Mark, too. Of course, now their OLD lies are respected. These bilious liars thought of some 'common' other Gospel being first, as they too didn't trust God to communicate His Word directly to the writers. Sigh.

God, foreknowing all this in advance, made sure Mark's own Gospel proved them all wrong. For they neglect a primary principle of hermeneutics, Bible's long rule of incorporation by reference, TO ESTABLISH A BOOK IS PART OF CANON. Introductory audio on that: . Relevant chrono backup, audio explaining: .

Future videos will demonstrate what the audio covers, directly from the Bible itself, live before your eyes.

In short, there are internal rules God enjoins on a writer, to prove God inspired his new book. God Proves His Word, word by word, verse by verse, by THREADING in, previous Divine Writ. Forensically, you can thus tell what Bible books were written at the time of the new one. Thus you can better certify the date of each book. Doesn't matter what it's written on, or when copied. The words themselves, serve as your definitive guide.

So Mark, being the 3rd Gospel, QUOTES from both Matthew and Luke. Mark being an eyewitness, as he knew Christ also, adds details.

See also the Synoptics playlist. You'll see how, beginning in Mk1:3, Mark quotes one or the other Gospel writer, and then makes deft changes of such GREEK wit you can only conclude Divine Origin. He manages to preserve the same meaning yet the changes are (usually bitingly) relevant to the time he writes.

You'll also need to order Lesson 1541 et seq (200 lessons) of my pastor's 'Paul's Fall' series at to get the revised chronology of Paul's death (corrected versus his 1975 analysis), which prompted the immediate issuance of Peter, Jude, Mark's Gospel, and Book of Hebrews. No one in the world has done this timing reconciliation, but him. His organization never asks for money.

# Uploaded 54 Plays 0 Comments

Mark's Gospel Proves Q Scholars Wrong

brainout PRO

AD69, Mark wrote his Gospel. Provably. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

GIST: Mark's own Gospel text proves he's THIRD. This channel/playlist…

+ More

AD69, Mark wrote his Gospel. Provably. To play these videos in order: channel . Sorting: click on 'Browse This Channel', then 'Videos'.

GIST: Mark's own Gospel text proves he's THIRD. This channel/playlist continues the Youtube Mark series videos after Episode 4e, and contains all Episodes excluding 5 and 6. Those latter two in Youtube, need revision. Youtube playlist is here: .

Series progressively shows why a) the 'Q' aka 'Quelle' Gospel claim, is a lie; for b) Bible proves Mark is 3rd Gospel. Synoptics playlist (still unfinished) is in tandem; Mark's 'wrapping' style (here, Episode 3) is there covered in more detail.

To their credit, for centuries 'conventional' Christian scholarship didn't buy into 'Quelle' claims. Yet the vocal bad apples have been around since 1800s; for a few of the (ahem) 'Church Fathers' thought there was some original unknown 'gospel' from which the writers 'copied'! Yeah, the Holy Spirit just couldn't give them the info directly?! In short, they didn't believe in Verbal Plenary Inspiration, the Cornerstone of our claim that the Bible is.. the Word of GOD (Hebrews 4:12, 2Peter1:20, etc). Wow.

Too bad the Quelle people, so hot on cutting-and-pasting together an 'original' Gospel which no Gospel writer ever knew, didn't do their homework on how to read serial literature. Like, the Bible. Ooops.

For even today, if you watch some TV series like Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, or Grimm; or, if you read any of Dickens' books (which were all serially published per section); or today, 'The Green Mile' by Stephen King; you'd know how each successive 'episode' or 'book' ties BACKWARDS to what went before.

So too, Scripture. Trick is to know WHEN each book was written. You know that in Bible, by two types of text identifiers: 1) a DATELINE in the meter of each book, usually at the beginning, but sometimes in significant chapters, too; and 2) KEYWORDS, quotes, and THEMES of the (usually-latest) books referenced.

Example: if I mentioned Hexenbeist, you wouldn't know what that was, until several episodes into Season One, of 'Grimm'. But after it was introduced, you'd both have a specific idea of the term, and know WHO in the series, was one. Same, for Bible; you'll not see the term 'the Christ' in any OT passage prior to Daniel 7. After Daniel 7, you see much more wordplay; but the phrase is never used again, until the NT. So too, for 'Day' being figurative. It's never figurative in Bible, EXCEPT in the phrase, 'Day of the Lord', which wasn't used until Isaiah (playing off Moses' Psalm 90).

Scholars do know about keywords and thematic ties, but they never think to use those techniques, on the NEW Testament writers quoting each other. Of course, the dippy 'scholars' think the writers borrowed existing material, instead of getting their information (AND how to write it) directly from the Holy Spirit. Yikes!

For scholars know that writers quote prior Bible in their books, yet suddenly are clueless when Mark does that. The shortness of Mark's Gospel is due to the fact a) it's the THIRD one, and b) it's a hurried reminder why God soon (within 18 months) destroys the Temple. It's written in the Year of the 4 Emperors. See Episode 5a and 5b of the 'Royal Family of God' videos for the background.

Scholars also don't know about the meter dateline, because they impose Western standards of poetry meter on Bible text, thereby find nothing; so they conclude Bible has no meter of its own. But everyone in the ancient world memorized Bible and other text by SYLLABLE COUNTS, so it should have been obvious that some kind of ACCOUNTING meter system was used. To demonstrate how that system works, I've compiled playlists; see the 'How God Orchestrates Time' section on my channel pages.

Thus you know there's no such thing as a 'Q' gospel which inept or dishonest 'scholars', promote. 2nd video in this list proves the 'Q' proponents themselves TELL you that Q is a HOAX! Some famous scholars in Christendom, both ancient and modern, endorse this hoax! See: degrees are no guarantee of integrity or competence. Pity the GOOD scholars (they always exist, too) who must contend with the bad! Pray for scholars. Pray on behalf of authority, Romans 13. WE NEED THEM TO BE COMPETENT.

Browse This Channel

Shout Box

  • brainout

    TO DOWNLOAD VIDEOS ON THIS CHANNEL, click on the '' link at the bottom of the video's description, to open its own page. Then, look for the Download tab on that page. Click it, then select the type of file you want.

    by brainout

Heads up: the shoutbox will be retiring soon. It’s tired of working, and can’t wait to relax. You can still send a message to the channel owner, though!

Channels are a simple, beautiful way to showcase and watch videos. Browse more Channels.